If you’ve been arrested or charged with petty theft in Santa Clarita, you’re facing criminal charges that can result in jail time, fines, a permanent criminal record, and lasting consequences affecting employment, housing, professional licenses, and your future. At Tu Defensor Criminalista, we provide aggressive, strategic legal representation to defend against petty theft charges and related shoplifting offenses throughout Santa Clarita and Los Angeles County.
Petty theft charges arise from countless situations—shoplifting at retail stores, taking items from unlocked vehicles, stealing bicycles, theft from employers, taking property during disputes with roommates or family members, or misunderstandings about property ownership. Many people charged with petty theft made impulsive mistakes, face false accusations, or had legitimate reasons to believe they had permission to take property. We’ve successfully defended hundreds of clients facing petty theft charges, achieving dismissals, acquittals, reduced charges, and favorable outcomes that protect our clients’ freedom, records, and futures.
Understanding California’s Petty Theft Laws
Petty theft is defined under California Penal Code Sections 484 and 488 as the unlawful taking of property valued at $950 or less with the intent to permanently deprive the owner of that property.
California Penal Code Sections 484 and 488 – Petty Theft Defined
According to California Penal Code Section 484[1], theft occurs when someone:
Takes possession of property owned by someone else
Without the owner’s consent
With the intent to permanently deprive the owner of that property
Moves the property (even a small distance)
When the value of property taken is $950 or less, the offense is classified as petty theft under California Penal Code Section 488[1].
Elements Prosecutors Must Prove
To convict someone of petty theft, prosecutors must prove beyond a reasonable doubt:
Taking and Carrying Away – You took possession of property belonging to another person and moved it, even slightly. The movement can be minimal—placing merchandise in your pocket or bag constitutes sufficient movement.
Property of Another – The property belonged to someone else. You cannot steal your own property.
Without Consent – You took the property without the owner’s permission. If you had permission, consent, or authority to take property, there’s no theft.
Intent to Permanently Deprive – You intended to keep the property permanently or for a substantial period, depriving the owner of its use. Borrowing property with intent to return it doesn’t constitute theft.
Value $950 or Less – The property’s value doesn’t exceed $950. Property valued above $950 constitutes grand theft, a more serious offense.
According to the California Courts[2], the prosecution bears the burden of proving every element beyond a reasonable doubt.
Types of Petty Theft
Petty theft encompasses various scenarios:
Shoplifting – Taking merchandise from retail stores without paying. This is the most common form of petty theft in Santa Clarita’s shopping centers and retail establishments.
Theft from Vehicles – Taking property from unlocked or broken-into vehicles.
Bicycle Theft – Stealing bicycles from bike racks, garages, or public areas.
Employee Theft – Taking property, merchandise, or money from employers.
Theft by False Pretenses – Obtaining property through lies or deception.
Theft by Trick – Using tricks or sleight of hand to take property.
Receiving Stolen Property – Knowingly buying, receiving, or possessing property you know is stolen (charged separately under Penal Code Section 496).
Petty Theft Incidents in Santa Clarita
Santa Clarita, with a population exceeding 228,000 residents according to the U.S. Census Bureau[3], has numerous retail establishments, shopping centers, and commercial areas where petty theft incidents occur.
Common Locations for Petty Theft in Santa Clarita
Westfield Valencia Town Center – The large shopping mall in Valencia experiences regular shoplifting incidents at department stores, clothing retailers, electronics stores, and specialty shops.
Retail Corridors – Shopping centers along Valencia Boulevard, Soledad Canyon Road, Bouquet Canyon Road, and throughout commercial areas in Valencia, Saugus, Canyon Country, and Newhall see frequent retail theft.
Target, Walmart, and Big Box Stores – Large retailers throughout Santa Clarita employ loss prevention personnel who monitor for shoplifting and make citizen’s arrests.
Grocery Stores – Supermarkets including Ralphs, Vons, Albertsons, and others experience theft of food, alcohol, cosmetics, and other merchandise.
Convenience Stores and Gas Stations – Smaller retailers throughout Santa Clarita experience theft of snacks, beverages, tobacco products, and merchandise.
Six Flags Magic Mountain – The popular theme park experiences theft from lockers, bags, and merchandise locations among millions of annual visitors.
Vehicle Thefts – Parking lots at shopping centers, apartment complexes, gyms, and public areas throughout Santa Clarita see thefts from vehicles when items are left visible.
Bicycle Thefts – Bikes stolen from schools, parks, residential areas, and bike racks throughout the city.
How Petty Theft Arrests Occur
Loss Prevention Detainments – Retail stores employ loss prevention officers who monitor for shoplifting via cameras and floor surveillance. When theft is observed, loss prevention officers conduct citizen’s arrests, detaining suspects until law enforcement arrives.
Police Response – The Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department[4] Santa Clarita Valley Sheriff’s Station responds to theft reports and shoplifting detainments. Deputies take reports, interview witnesses, collect evidence, and make formal arrests.
Surveillance Evidence – Modern retail stores have extensive camera systems recording theft incidents. This video evidence is provided to prosecutors.
Civil Demands – Beyond criminal charges, retailers often send civil demand letters requiring payment of $50 to $500 for shoplifting incidents under California Penal Code Section 490.5, regardless of whether merchandise was recovered or criminal charges were filed.
According to the California Department of Justice[5], thousands of petty theft arrests occur annually throughout California, with Los Angeles County accounting for a significant portion.
Penalties for Petty Theft Convictions in California
Petty theft is a misdemeanor offense carrying penalties that, while less severe than felonies, still create serious consequences.
Criminal Penalties
Petty theft under California Penal Code Section 488 is punishable by:
Up to 6 months in county jail
Fines up to $1,000
Summary (misdemeanor) probation, typically 1 to 3 years
Community service, often 40 to 80 hours
Restitution to victims for the value of stolen property
Theft prevention classes
Possibility of jail time even for first-time offenders, though less common
Proposition 47 and Petty Theft
California’s Proposition 47, passed by voters in 2014, reclassified many theft offenses as misdemeanors. According to the California Courts[6], Proposition 47 ensures that theft of property valued at $950 or less is charged as petty theft misdemeanor rather than felony grand theft, except in limited circumstances.
Enhanced Penalties for Prior Theft Convictions
While petty theft itself is a misdemeanor, prior theft convictions can result in enhanced consequences:
Second or Third Petty Theft Conviction – Additional theft convictions within a certain period can result in increased jail time and stricter probation terms.
Petty Theft with Prior – Under California Penal Code Section 666, if you have prior theft-related convictions and commit petty theft, prosecutors may charge you with a felony offense in limited circumstances, though Proposition 47 restricted this practice.
Collateral Consequences of Petty Theft Convictions
Employment Consequences – Petty theft convictions, classified as crimes of moral turpitude involving dishonesty, severely impact employment:
Background checks reveal theft convictions to all potential employers
Employers in retail, banking, financial services, healthcare, education, and positions involving trust refuse to hire individuals with theft convictions
Current employers may terminate employment upon discovering theft convictions
Professional opportunities requiring integrity and honesty become unavailable
Professional Licensing – State licensing boards for nurses, teachers, real estate agents, contractors, accountants, security guards, and other licensed professionals may deny, suspend, or revoke licenses based on theft convictions.
Housing Consequences – Landlords conduct background checks and frequently deny rental applications based on theft convictions. Public housing programs may exclude individuals with criminal records.
Immigration Consequences – For non-citizens, theft convictions can constitute crimes involving moral turpitude under immigration law. While a single petty theft conviction with sentence under one year typically doesn’t trigger automatic deportation, it can affect:
Adjustment of status applications
Naturalization eligibility
Re-entry after international travel
Discretionary relief from removal
Demonstration of good moral character
The U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services[7] considers theft crimes involving dishonesty serious for immigration purposes. Non-citizens should immediately consult both criminal defense and immigration attorneys.
Education Consequences – College applications, scholarship eligibility, and student housing may be affected by theft convictions.
Firearm Restrictions – While misdemeanor petty theft doesn’t automatically prohibit firearm ownership like felonies, judges may impose firearm restrictions as probation conditions.
Social Stigma – Theft convictions carry social stigma affecting personal relationships, community standing, and self-image.
Defenses to Petty Theft Charges
Petty theft charges can be defended using various legal strategies depending on case-specific facts. At Tu Defensor Criminalista, we thoroughly investigate every aspect of arrests to identify the strongest defenses.
Lack of Intent to Permanently Deprive
Theft requires specific intent to permanently deprive owners of property. If you intended to borrow property temporarily or return it, you lacked the intent required for conviction.
Common scenarios involving lack of intent:
Forgetting to pay for items while shopping with multiple purchases
Taking property you intended to return
Misunderstanding about whether you needed to pay for items
Confusion in self-checkout situations
We present evidence establishing lack of intent including testimony about your state of mind, circumstances showing you intended to pay, and patterns of behavior inconsistent with theft.
Claim of Right
If you genuinely believed you had a right to property—even if mistaken—you lacked the fraudulent intent required for theft. This defense applies when:
You believed property belonged to you
You thought you had permission to take property
You were settling a debt or dispute you believed entitled you to property
Legitimate ownership disputes existed
The belief must be honest and in good faith, even if ultimately incorrect.
Consent or Permission
If you had consent or permission to take property, there’s no theft. This defense applies when:
Property owners gave you permission (verbally or implied)
You reasonably believed you had permission based on past practices
You had authority to take property based on your relationship with owners
We establish consent through witness testimony, communications showing permission, and evidence of relationships or circumstances creating reasonable belief of permission.
Retail loss prevention mistakes identifying wrong persons
Witnesses mistaking you for actual perpetrators
Malicious false reports from people with grudges
Misunderstandings about who took property
We challenge identifications through:
Cross-examination exposing witness uncertainty
Video evidence showing you didn’t commit theft
Alibi evidence proving you were elsewhere
Demonstrating someone else took property
Exposing accusers’ motives to fabricate
Insufficient Evidence
Prosecutors must prove theft beyond a reasonable doubt. If evidence is insufficient, contradictory, or unreliable, charges should be dismissed. Common evidentiary weaknesses include:
Lack of video evidence showing theft
No witnesses directly observing theft
Unclear evidence about who took property
Inability to prove property value
Missing or incomplete chain of custody for evidence
Conflicting witness statements
Lack of Movement
Theft requires moving property. If you merely touched property but didn’t take it or move it, theft elements aren’t satisfied. This can apply in shoplifting cases where you handled merchandise but didn’t conceal it or attempt to leave without paying.
Value Dispute
If property value exceeds $950, charges should be grand theft, not petty theft. Conversely, if prosecution alleges value is higher than actual value, challenging valuations may be important for charging or sentencing. We retain experts to establish accurate property values when disputed.
Illegal Detention by Loss Prevention
Retailers can detain suspected shoplifters under California’s “shopkeeper’s privilege,” but only under specific conditions:
Reasonable cause to believe theft occurred
Detention conducted in reasonable manner
Detention for reasonable time
Detention on or near store premises
If loss prevention officers violated these requirements, evidence obtained during illegal detention may be suppressed, and you may have civil claims for false imprisonment.
Violation of Constitutional Rights
If law enforcement violated your constitutional rights, evidence may be suppressed:
Illegal searches of your person, bags, or vehicle without consent or probable cause
Coerced confessions or statements without Miranda warnings
Prolonged detention without probable cause
Denial of right to counsel
Entrapment
In rare cases involving undercover operations or sting operations, entrapment may apply if law enforcement induced you to commit theft you weren’t predisposed to commit.
Shoplifting Defense Strategies
Shoplifting cases, the most common form of petty theft in Santa Clarita, involve specific defense considerations.
California Penal Code Section 459.5 – Shoplifting
Proposition 47 created a specific shoplifting offense under California Penal Code Section 459.5, defining shoplifting as entering a commercial establishment during business hours with intent to commit theft where the value doesn’t exceed $950.
This provision prevents prosecutors from charging shoplifting as burglary (a felony), limiting charges to petty theft misdemeanor.
Common Shoplifting Defenses
Forgetfulness – Shoppers juggling multiple items, distracted by children, or preoccupied sometimes forget to pay for items without any intent to steal.
Confusion at Self-Checkout – Self-checkout systems can be confusing, leading to scanning errors or genuine mistakes about whether items were scanned properly.
Intent to Pay – If you fully intended to pay for merchandise but were detained before reaching registers, lack of intent can be established.
Price Tag Switching – In cases where you’re accused of switching price tags, we challenge whether prosecution can prove you—rather than someone else—switched tags.
Accidentally Leaving Store – Walking out of stores absentmindedly without completing purchases doesn’t constitute theft if you lacked intent to steal.
Challenging Loss Prevention Procedures
We scrutinize loss prevention procedures to identify violations:
Whether you concealed merchandise with intent to steal or merely moved items
Whether detention was conducted properly
Whether detention time was reasonable
Whether loss prevention followed company policies
The Criminal Process for Petty Theft Cases
Understanding what happens after petty theft arrests helps you navigate the criminal justice system.
Arrest and Citation
Petty theft arrests typically result in:
Citation release at the scene or shortly after booking
Promise to appear in court on specified date
Release without bail given the minor nature of offense
Some defendants are booked at the Santa Clarita Valley Sheriff’s Station and released within hours.
Arraignment
Your first court appearance occurs at the Santa Clarita Courthouse within several weeks of arrest. At arraignment:
You’re formally advised of charges
You enter a plea (not guilty, guilty, or no contest)
Court dates are set for pretrial proceedings
You can request appointed counsel if you can’t afford an attorney
We strongly recommend having an attorney at arraignment to enter not guilty pleas and begin building defenses immediately.
Pretrial Proceedings
Most petty theft cases resolve during pretrial proceedings through dismissals, diversion programs, or plea agreements.
Discovery – Prosecutors provide evidence including police reports, witness statements, photographs, video surveillance, and loss prevention reports. We thoroughly review all evidence to identify weaknesses and build defenses.
Negotiations – We negotiate with Los Angeles County prosecutors seeking dismissals, diversion programs, reduced charges, or favorable plea agreements. According to the Los Angeles County District Attorney’s Office[8], many petty theft cases, particularly first-time offenses involving small amounts, resolve through diversion or civil compromise.
Motion Practice – We file motions to suppress evidence obtained through illegal searches or detentions, dismiss charges based on insufficient evidence, or exclude prejudicial evidence.
Trial
If cases proceed to trial, we provide aggressive representation:
Jury selection (6-person juries for misdemeanors) identifying fair, impartial jurors
Opening statements framing defenses
Cross-examination of loss prevention officers, police, and witnesses
If convictions occur through plea agreements or trial verdicts, sentencing determines punishment. We present mitigation evidence including:
Lack of criminal history
Evidence of good character
Employment and education
Family responsibilities
Completion of theft prevention classes before sentencing
Restitution already paid
Letters of support from community members
Our advocacy seeks probation without jail time, minimal fines, and alternatives protecting records and futures.
Diversion Programs and Alternative Resolutions
Many petty theft defendants avoid convictions through diversion programs and alternative resolutions.
Pretrial Diversion
For first-time offenders with no significant criminal history, prosecutors may offer pretrial diversion where you:
Complete theft prevention or life skills classes
Perform community service
Pay restitution to victims
Stay out of trouble for specified period (typically 6-12 months)
Have charges dismissed upon successful completion
Diversion allows you to avoid conviction entirely. Upon completion, you can petition to seal arrest records.
Civil Compromise – Penal Code Section 1377
California Penal Code Section 1377 allows civil compromise for petty theft. If you:
Compensate victims for property value and losses
Obtain victim agreement to dismiss charges
Present agreement to court
Judges may dismiss criminal cases. Civil compromise works best when victims are individuals or small businesses willing to accept restitution in exchange for case dismissal.
Deferred Entry of Judgment
Some courts offer deferred entry of judgment where you:
Plead guilty but judgment is deferred
Complete probation including classes and community service
Have guilty plea withdrawn and case dismissed upon successful completion
Informal Diversion
Some prosecutors offer informal diversion for very minor first offenses where you:
Pay small fees
Complete short community service
Stay out of trouble for several months
Have charges dismissed without formal court proceedings
Plea Agreements with Reduced Consequences
When complete dismissal isn’t achievable, we negotiate plea agreements that:
Reduce jail exposure or eliminate custody entirely
Minimize probation terms
Reduce fines and fees
Allow community service instead of fines
Preserve eligibility for future record sealing
Sealing Petty Theft Records
Even after petty theft convictions, California law provides mechanisms to seal records and reduce long-term consequences.
Expungement – Penal Code Section 1203.4
After successfully completing probation (or after conviction if probation wasn’t granted), you can petition for expungement under California Penal Code Section 1203.4. Expungement:
Changes records to show case dismissal rather than conviction
Allows you to state you weren’t convicted on most job applications
Improves employment and housing prospects
Relieves many consequences of conviction
According to the California Courts[2], expungement is available for most misdemeanor convictions after completing sentences.
Arrest Record Sealing – Penal Code Section 851.91
If charges are dismissed, you’re acquitted, or prosecution decides not to file charges, you can petition to seal arrest records entirely under Penal Code Section 851.91, making arrests invisible on most background checks.
Protecting Your Immigration Status
For non-citizen Santa Clarita residents, protecting immigration status when facing petty theft charges is critical.
While single petty theft convictions with sentences under one year typically don’t trigger automatic deportation, theft convictions can affect:
Discretionary relief applications
Naturalization eligibility
Inadmissibility determinations
Good moral character evaluations
We coordinate criminal defense with immigration counsel to develop strategies protecting both criminal and immigration interests, including:
Fighting for complete dismissal
Negotiating to non-theft offenses that aren’t crimes involving moral turpitude
Ensuring sentences stay below one year
Advising about immigration consequences before plea agreements
Frequently Asked Questions
Will I go to jail for first-time petty theft?
Unlikely. Most first-time petty theft defendants receive probation without jail time, especially when the value of the property is low and there is no prior criminal record. Diversion programs are commonly available for first offenses.
Can petty theft charges be dismissed?
Yes. Many cases are dismissed through pretrial diversion, civil compromise, insufficient evidence, or effective legal defenses. With strong representation and favorable facts, dismissal is often achievable.
What’s the difference between petty theft and shoplifting?
In California, shoplifting is a specific form of petty theft that involves entering a commercial establishment during regular business hours with intent to steal property valued at $950 or less. All shoplifting falls under petty theft, but petty theft also includes other types of unlawful taking outside that specific scenario.
Will this affect my job?
It can. Theft convictions typically appear on background checks, and many employers—particularly in retail, finance, healthcare, and education—may be reluctant to hire individuals with theft-related convictions. Avoiding conviction through diversion or obtaining expungement can significantly reduce employment impact.
Can I get my record expunged?
Yes. After successfully completing probation, you may petition for expungement under California Penal Code Section 1203.4. While expungement does not erase the record, it updates the case to reflect a dismissal, which can improve employment prospects.
What if I’m accused of taking something worth more than I thought?
Property value is a key issue. If the prosecution alleges a value exceeding $950 (which could elevate the charge to grand theft), the valuation can be challenged through evidence or expert testimony to support a lower value or potentially seek dismissal.
Should I pay the civil demand letter?
Consult an attorney before making any payment. Paying a civil demand does not prevent criminal prosecution and may be interpreted as an admission of wrongdoing. Legal guidance is important before responding.
What if I forgot to pay for something by accident?
Theft requires intent. If you genuinely forgot to pay and lacked intent to steal, that can serve as a strong defense. Evidence showing distraction, confusion, or an honest mistake can undermine the prosecution’s case.
Understanding Civil Demand Letters
After shoplifting incidents, retailers often send civil demand letters under California Penal Code Section 490.5 demanding payment of $50 to $500 for shoplifting incidents. These civil demands:
Are separate from criminal cases
Don’t prevent criminal prosecution
Request payment for retailer’s costs of addressing theft
Can be sent even when merchandise was recovered
Create no legal obligation to pay in many situations
Many defendants wonder whether paying prevents prosecution. It doesn’t—criminal and civil proceedings are separate. Consult an attorney before responding to civil demands.
Why Early Representation Matters
Early legal representation in petty theft cases provides critical advantages:
Intervention before charges are formally filed in some cases
Early negotiation with prosecutors about diversion or dismissal
Protection of rights during investigations
Strategic advice about handling civil demands
Reduction of stress during difficult times
Better negotiating position before cases progress
Many petty theft cases resolve favorably with early, aggressive legal intervention.
Contact Tu Defensor Criminalista Today
If you’ve been arrested or charged with petty theft in Santa Clarita, time is critical. These charges can result in jail time, permanent criminal records, and lasting consequences affecting employment, housing, and your future. Early intervention by experienced legal counsel can mean the difference between conviction and dismissal, between a permanent record and a clean slate.
At Tu Defensor Criminalista, we provide aggressive, strategic legal representation for petty theft charges throughout Santa Clarita and Los Angeles County. We understand that people make mistakes, face false accusations, or find themselves in difficult situations. We fight tirelessly to protect your rights, your record, and your future.
Don’t let petty theft charges destroy your future. Contact us today for a confidential consultation to discuss your case, explore your options, and begin building your defense.
Our Commitment to You
At Tu Defensor Criminalista, we are committed to:
Aggressive Defense – We fight tirelessly for the best possible outcomes, challenging evidence, presenting defenses, and negotiating favorable resolutions.
Non-Judgmental Representation – We understand that good people make mistakes. We treat you with dignity and respect regardless of circumstances.
Clear Communication – We explain the legal process, your options, and our strategies in clear, understandable language. We remain accessible to answer questions.
Bilingual Services – We provide fluent Spanish-language services for clients more comfortable communicating in Spanish. “Hablamos Español.”
Personalized Attention – Every petty theft case involves unique facts and circumstances. We develop defense strategies tailored to your specific situation.
Results-Focused Representation – Our goal is achieving the best possible outcome—dismissal, diversion, reduced charges, or minimal penalties protecting your record and future.
Affordable Representation – We offer competitive rates and payment plans making quality legal representation accessible.
Serving Santa Clarita and Surrounding Communities
While our focus is Santa Clarita, we serve clients throughout the Santa Clarita Valley and northern Los Angeles County including:
Valencia
Newhall
Saugus
Canyon Country
Stevenson Ranch
Castaic
Agua Dulce
Acton
We understand the local courts, judges, prosecutors, and retail community. This local knowledge enhances our ability to provide effective representation in the Santa Clarita area.
Take Action to Protect Your Future
A petty theft charge doesn’t have to result in conviction and a permanent criminal record. With experienced legal representation, many individuals facing petty theft charges achieve outcomes that protect their freedom, their records, and their futures.
The path forward begins with contacting experienced legal counsel to discuss your case confidentially, understand your options, and begin building your defense.
Contact Tu Defensor Criminalista today at (888) 315-3326[9]. We’re available 24/7 to provide the immediate assistance you need.
Don’t face petty theft charges alone. Don’t assume conviction is inevitable. Don’t let one mistake define your future.
Your future is worth fighting for. Let us fight for you.
Citations and Sources
Throughout this content, we have referenced statistics, facts, and information from authoritative sources to provide accurate, reliable information about petty theft laws, enforcement, and criminal justice in Santa Clarita and California.
Below is a complete list of sources cited in this content:
California Legislative Information – California Penal Code Sections 484, 488, 459.5, 490.5, 496, 666, 851.91, 1203.4, 1377, and related statutes https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/[1]
California Courts – Information about criminal proceedings and petty theft prosecutions https://www.courts.ca.gov/[2]
California Courts – Proposition 47 Information – Prop 47 reclassification and impact on theft crimes https://www.courts.ca.gov/prop47.htm[6]
U.S. Census Bureau – Population and demographic data for Santa Clarita, California https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/santaclaritacitycalifornia[3]
Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department – Law enforcement services and crime response https://www.lasd.org/[4]
California Department of Justice – Crime statistics and theft data https://openjustice.doj.ca.gov/[5]
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services – Immigration consequences of criminal convictions https://www.uscis.gov/[7]
Los Angeles County District Attorney’s Office – Prosecution information and policies https://da.lacounty.gov/[8]
Attorney Armando Josué Cespedes is rated 5.0 on Avvo, with 34 five-star reviews from clients praising his dedication, professionalism, and results. Many note how his trial skills and attention to detail led to reduced charges or outright dismissals.
I was arrested for a DUI just recently, since Spanish is my first language, it was important to find a great attorney who was bilingual. Getting your first DUI can...
Armando cespedes went above and beyond for my case. I was very close to getting my license revoked as I am under the age of 21 and received my second...
I was referred to Mr. Cespedes by a family friend who was very pleased with his legal services. Unfortunately, I got a DUI a few months ago and I was...
Armando gets results with your best interest in mind. I was wrongfully being accused of making primal threats. Even though I was innocent, I was aware that the accusations are...
Extremely professional I recently had a brief phone consultation with Mr. Cespedes regarding a longtime friend of mine. Although he was unable to assist him with his legal needs, I...