
Facing criminal charges, an internal affairs investigation, or an administrative disciplinary proceeding as a police officer in San Bernardino County? Your situation is unlike any other criminal defendant’s. You are not just fighting a criminal charge — you are fighting for your career, your pension, your POST certification, your professional reputation, and your Second Amendment right to carry a firearm. A conviction or sustained administrative finding can end a career that took years to build, strip you of the retirement benefits you have earned, and permanently close the door on any future in law enforcement.
Law enforcement officers in San Bernardino County face a unique set of pressures and vulnerabilities when they are accused of crimes or misconduct. The same agencies that once had your back now conduct investigations designed to build a case against you. Prosecutors who work alongside you every day pursue your conviction with the same — or greater — intensity than any other defendant. The public, the media, and department brass scrutinize every aspect of your conduct. And the standard defenses available to civilian defendants may not apply in the same way to officers whose conduct is measured against professional standards, department policies, and the law of qualified immunity.
You need a defense attorney who understands law enforcement culture, the specific legal standards that apply to officer conduct, the interplay between criminal proceedings and administrative investigations, and the Peace Officer Bill of Rights protections that California law provides to every law enforcement officer under investigation. At Tu Defensor Criminalista, Attorney Armando Josué Cespedes provides skilled, aggressive criminal and administrative defense for law enforcement officers throughout San Bernardino County — including officers employed by the San Bernardino County Sheriff’s Department[1], the San Bernardino Police Department[2], the Fontana Police Department, the Ontario Police Department, the Rancho Cucamonga Sheriff’s Station, the Rialto Police Department, the Victorville Police Department, the Redlands Police Department, and every other law enforcement agency serving San Bernardino County communities.
Free Confidential Consultation: (888) 315-3326 | Available 24/7 | Hablamos Español
When a law enforcement officer is charged with a crime or faces administrative disciplinary action, the consequences extend far beyond what a civilian defendant typically faces. The stakes are multiplied across multiple dimensions simultaneously:
One of the most important and dangerous aspects of being a law enforcement officer accused of misconduct is that you face two entirely separate and parallel proceedings simultaneously — and each can destroy your career independently of the other:
Coordinating the defense of both proceedings simultaneously — ensuring that your administrative statements do not harm your criminal defense and that your criminal defense strategy supports your administrative case — requires an attorney who understands both systems deeply.
The California Public Safety Officers Procedural Bill of Rights Act (Government Code §§ 3300–3312) — commonly known as the Peace Officer Bill of Rights (POBR) — provides critical procedural protections to every peace officer employed by a public agency in California when they are subject to investigation or discipline for alleged misconduct.
Key POBR Protections That Apply to Every San Bernardino County Officer Under Investigation:
At Tu Defensor Criminalista, we know the POBR inside and out. We enforce your rights aggressively at every stage of the investigation — from the first notice of interrogation through the final administrative appeal. Violations of POBR rights can result in suppression of evidence and reversal of disciplinary actions.
Law enforcement officers in San Bernardino County face criminal charges for alleged use of excessive force under both California state law and federal law. These charges arise from:
California State Charges:
Federal Charges:
The standard of justification for use of force by law enforcement is established by Graham v. Connor — whether the force was objectively reasonable under the circumstances known to the officer at the time. We build defenses based on this legal standard, using department use-of-force policies, expert witnesses, and all available video and forensic evidence.
Law enforcement officers are arrested for domestic violence at higher rates than the general public, and domestic violence accusations between officers — or involving officers and civilians — are prosecuted vigorously throughout San Bernardino County.
A domestic violence conviction under California Penal Code § 273.5 (corporal injury to a spouse or cohabitant) or PC § 243(e)(1) (domestic battery) triggers the federal Lautenberg Amendment — permanently prohibiting firearm possession under 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(9). For a law enforcement officer, this means immediate termination and permanent career end.
We fight domestic violence charges against law enforcement officers with the understanding that the stakes go beyond the criminal penalty to include immediate and permanent career destruction. Early intervention — before charges are even filed — is often the most effective strategy.
Law enforcement officers charged with DUI in San Bernardino County face not only the standard criminal consequences but also:
We handle DUI defense for law enforcement officers with full awareness of both the criminal case and the administrative consequences, pursuing the best overall outcome across both proceedings.
Officers charged with theft of evidence, embezzlement of seized property or funds, accepting bribes, or other financial crimes face some of the most serious career-ending charges in law enforcement. These charges are prosecuted by the San Bernardino County District Attorney’s Public Integrity Division[3] and, in some cases, by federal prosecutors.
We defend officers facing financial crime allegations with thorough investigation of the evidence, forensic accounting analysis, and aggressive challenge of the prosecution’s characterization of the alleged conduct.
Law enforcement officers face sex crime allegations arising from on-duty conduct, off-duty incidents, or allegations by individuals who were previously arrested or in custody. These charges are among the most serious and most publicly damaging that an officer can face. We provide aggressive, strategic defense while understanding the unique evidentiary issues that arise in cases involving officers and civilian complainants.
Charges of perjury under PC § 118, filing a false report under PC § 118.1, or making false statements in official documents arise from accusations that an officer fabricated or falsified evidence, reports, or testimony. These charges not only carry criminal penalties but also trigger Brady disclosure obligations — meaning the officer’s name may be placed on the San Bernardino County DA’s Brady/Giglio list, permanently affecting their ability to testify in future prosecutions and potentially ending their career even without a conviction.
We fight perjury and false report charges with full awareness of the Brady implications and work to prevent Brady listing as part of our comprehensive defense strategy.
Law enforcement officers charged with drug possession, drug use, or drug diversion — including diversion of controlled substances from evidence rooms or while on duty — face both criminal charges and automatic administrative action. We defend officers in these cases understanding the full scope of the consequences in both proceedings.
Officers are sometimes charged for alleged criminal conduct that occurs entirely off-duty and without any connection to their official capacity. While the criminal charges may be treated similarly to civilian charges, the administrative consequences can be severe — departments have authority to discipline officers for off-duty conduct that reflects poorly on the department or violates the oath of office.
We defend officers facing off-duty criminal charges while simultaneously advising on the administrative implications and developing a coordinated strategy across both proceedings.
Internal affairs investigations by the San Bernardino County Sheriff’s Department[1], the San Bernardino Police Department, and other county agencies are conducted internally and operate under different rules than criminal investigations. The lower burden of proof — preponderance of the evidence — means that conduct insufficient to support a criminal conviction can still result in termination.
Critical Advice for Officers Under Internal Affairs Investigation:
We engage with internal affairs investigations at the earliest possible stage, protecting our clients’ rights throughout the investigative process and positioning the defense for the best possible outcome in subsequent disciplinary proceedings.
The California Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training (POST) has the authority to decertify — permanently revoke the peace officer certification of — officers who are convicted of felonies, certain misdemeanors, or who are found to have engaged in serious misconduct including dishonesty or excessive force.
According to California POST[4], POST decertification is the most serious professional consequence an officer can face — it is permanent, statewide, and effectively ends any future in California law enforcement. We defend officers in POST decertification proceedings by:
The Brady disclosure obligation — arising from Brady v. Maryland and Giglio v. United States — requires prosecutors to disclose information that is material to the defense in criminal cases, including information about the credibility of law enforcement witnesses. When a prosecutor determines that an officer has a history of dishonesty, perjury, or misconduct affecting their credibility, that officer may be placed on the district attorney’s Brady list.
The San Bernardino County District Attorney’s Office[3] maintains a Brady/Giglio list. Placement on this list effectively ends an officer’s ability to be called as a witness in criminal prosecutions — which, for working patrol officers and investigators, means the end of their practical usefulness to their agency and often leads to termination regardless of whether any criminal charges were filed or sustained.
We fight Brady listing proactively — working to prevent placement through defense of the underlying misconduct allegations and, when placement has already occurred, pursuing removal through available administrative and legal avenues.
San Bernardino County is the largest county by land area in the contiguous United States, covering more than 20,000 square miles. According to the U.S. Census Bureau[5], the county has a population of more than 2.1 million people served by multiple law enforcement agencies.
The San Bernardino County Sheriff’s Department[1] is one of the largest sheriff’s departments in the United States, with thousands of sworn personnel serving unincorporated areas and numerous cities throughout the county under contract. Municipal police departments including those in San Bernardino, Fontana, Ontario, Rancho Cucamonga, Rialto, Victorville, Redlands, Highland, Upland, and Colton employ additional thousands of sworn officers. Correctional officers at the various San Bernardino County jail facilities, probation officers, and state law enforcement personnel assigned to the region round out the law enforcement community.
According to the California Department of Justice[6], San Bernardino County’s law enforcement agencies collectively handle hundreds of thousands of calls for service annually — creating the conditions under which use-of-force incidents, administrative complaints, and criminal accusations against officers arise.
According to California POST[4], California employs tens of thousands of sworn peace officers across hundreds of agencies statewide. The professional and legal standards that govern their conduct — and the consequences of criminal charges and administrative actions — are uniform across all agencies, making specialized legal defense essential for any officer anywhere in San Bernardino County who faces criminal or administrative proceedings.
The Garrity v. New Jersey doctrine is one of the most important legal protections available to law enforcement officers under administrative investigation. Understanding it — and ensuring it is properly invoked and honored — is essential to protecting both your administrative case and your criminal defense simultaneously.
What Garrity Protects:
When a law enforcement officer is ordered by their employer to answer questions under threat of termination — in a compelled administrative interrogation — the Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination is not waived. Any statements made under that compulsion cannot be used against the officer in a subsequent criminal prosecution. This is the Garrity protection.
How Garrity Works in Practice:
The Critical Risk:
Voluntary statements — those made without a specific order and threat of discipline — are not protected by Garrity. Officers who voluntarily speak to internal affairs investigators, law enforcement colleagues, or prosecutors without asserting Garrity protections may inadvertently provide statements that can be used against them criminally.
At Tu Defensor Criminalista, we advise law enforcement officer clients on exactly when and how to invoke Garrity protections, when to remain silent, and how to navigate the parallel criminal and administrative proceedings to protect your interests in both simultaneously.
Criminal cases against law enforcement officers in San Bernardino County are prosecuted through the San Bernardino County Superior Court system and, in federal civil rights cases, through the United States District Court for the Central District of California. The primary state criminal courthouse serving San Bernardino city is:
San Bernardino Justice Center 247 West Third Street San Bernardino, CA 92415
Additional courthouses throughout San Bernardino County handle cases from their respective service areas, including courts in Rancho Cucamonga, Victorville, and other communities. According to the San Bernardino County Superior Court[7], the court processes thousands of criminal cases annually.
What to Expect in Your Law Enforcement Criminal Case:
Defending a law enforcement officer requires more than general criminal defense knowledge. It requires understanding how officers are trained, what policies govern their conduct, how use-of-force decisions are made in the field, and how those decisions are evaluated against constitutional and departmental standards. We bring this understanding to every aspect of your defense.
The most dangerous mistake an officer can make is treating the criminal and administrative proceedings as separate matters handled by separate representatives without coordination. Statements made in administrative proceedings can affect the criminal case. Admissions in criminal proceedings can affect the administrative case. We coordinate every aspect of both proceedings to protect your interests across all fronts simultaneously.
We know the Peace Officer Bill of Rights in detail and enforce it aggressively. Violations of POBR protections during the investigative process can result in suppression of evidence and reversal of disciplinary actions. We monitor for POBR violations from the moment of our engagement.
The Garrity doctrine is one of the most important protections available to officers under investigation, and it must be invoked and maintained correctly. We advise officer clients on exactly how to protect their compelled administrative statements from criminal use while navigating their administrative obligations.
For officers whose future employment depends on their ability to testify in criminal cases, Brady listing is a career-ending administrative action independent of any criminal charge. We fight Brady listing proactively and pursue removal through every available legal avenue.
POST decertification is permanent and statewide. We defend officers in POST proceedings with the same intensity we bring to criminal defense, understanding that a decertified officer cannot return to law enforcement anywhere in California.
We practice regularly in San Bernardino County Superior Court and understand the specific agencies, prosecutors, and judicial approaches in this county. Our local knowledge informs every aspect of how we approach an officer’s defense.
San Bernardino County’s law enforcement community is diverse, with many Spanish-speaking officers throughout the county’s agencies. We provide complete legal representation in both English and Spanish.
Law enforcement officer cases require a level of discretion that goes beyond standard criminal defense. We handle every aspect of our officer clients’ cases with strict confidentiality, understanding that publicity can cause damage independent of any legal outcome.
Criminal investigations of law enforcement officers can arise at any hour — following a use-of-force incident, after a complaint is filed, or when internal affairs calls for an immediate interview. We are available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week to provide immediate guidance.
Attorney Armando Josué Cespedes holds a perfect 5.0 Avvo rating with 34 five-star client reviews and three consecutive Client’s Choice Awards (2023, 2024, 2025). Our clients consistently praise our thoroughness, responsiveness, and results in high-stakes criminal cases.
Union representation and private legal defense serve different purposes. Your union representative protects your interests as a union member in the administrative process. A private attorney protects your interests in criminal proceedings and can coordinate the administrative and criminal defense simultaneously. In serious cases, private defense counsel is essential.
Yes. The administrative proceeding operates under a lower burden of proof — preponderance of the evidence — than the criminal case’s beyond-a-reasonable-doubt standard. An acquittal in criminal court does not prevent termination in an administrative proceeding based on the same conduct.
A Skelly hearing is a pre-disciplinary hearing that gives you an opportunity to present your side before punishment is imposed. It is one of the most important and most underutilized opportunities in the administrative process. Yes — you need experienced legal representation at your Skelly hearing to make the most of this critical opportunity.
Invoke your right to union representation and contact a private attorney before providing any statement. Whether your statement will be compelled or voluntary has significant consequences for both the administrative and criminal proceedings. Do not speak to internal affairs without legal guidance.
Garrity v. New Jersey holds that statements compelled from a public employee under threat of job loss cannot be used against them in a subsequent criminal prosecution. When your department orders you to answer questions under threat of termination, your compelled answers are protected from criminal use. However, this protection must be properly invoked and maintained. We advise officer clients on exactly how to navigate this in every investigation.
A DUI conviction does not automatically trigger a firearm prohibition, but it typically results in serious administrative consequences including suspension, demotion, or termination depending on your agency’s policies. We fight DUI charges for law enforcement officers understanding the full scope of career consequences alongside the criminal penalties.
Brady/Giglio listing by the San Bernardino County DA’s office occurs when a prosecutor determines an officer has a credibility problem that must be disclosed in criminal cases. Placement on the list effectively ends an officer’s utility as a witness and often leads to termination. We fight Brady listing proactively and pursue removal through available legal avenues. Prevention through successful defense of underlying misconduct allegations is always the most effective strategy.
Yes. A domestic violence conviction — even a misdemeanor under PC § 243(e)(1) — triggers the federal Lautenberg Amendment’s lifetime firearm prohibition. Law enforcement officers cannot perform their duties without being able to carry a firearm. The prohibition is permanent and cannot be expunged. This makes fighting domestic violence charges with the maximum available resources absolutely essential for any officer.
A criminal charge, internal affairs investigation, or administrative proceeding against a law enforcement officer in San Bernardino County threatens everything you have built — your career, your pension, your POST certification, your reputation, and your future. The decisions you make in the earliest stages of any investigation can determine the outcome across every subsequent proceeding.
Do not face these proceedings without experienced, dedicated legal representation that understands both the criminal justice system and the unique legal landscape governing law enforcement officer defense. At Tu Defensor Criminalista, we fight for law enforcement officers throughout San Bernardino County at every stage of every proceeding — criminal, administrative, and POST. Contact us today for a free, confidential consultation.
Attorney Armando Josué Cespedes is rated 5.0 on Avvo, with 34 five-star reviews from clients praising his dedication, professionalism, and results. Many note how his trial skills and attention to detail led to reduced charges or outright dismissals.












Thank you! We need your help. Would you share your experience on one of these sites?
If you have concerns you wish to address privately
