If you’ve been arrested or charged with resisting arrest in Lancaster, you’re facing serious criminal charges that can result in jail time, fines, a permanent criminal record, and consequences affecting your employment, immigration status, and future opportunities. At Tu Defensor Criminalista, we provide aggressive, experienced legal representation to defend against all resisting arrest charges throughout Lancaster and Los Angeles County.
Resisting arrest charges arise when law enforcement officers allege that you resisted, delayed, or obstructed them during an arrest or while they were performing their official duties. These arrests occur throughout Lancaster on Avenue I, 10th Street West, Lancaster Boulevard, Sierra Highway, State Route 14, and throughout the Antelope Valley when California Highway Patrol officers or Lancaster Sheriff’s Station deputies claim you physically resisted, fled from officers, or refused to comply with commands during arrests for other offenses or during routine police encounters. Many people charged with resisting arrest were merely exercising their constitutional rights, defending themselves against excessive force, or caught up in chaotic situations where officers’ accounts don’t match reality. We’ve successfully defended hundreds of clients facing resisting arrest charges throughout Southern California, achieving dismissals, acquittals at trial, reduced charges, and favorable outcomes that protect our clients’ freedom, records, and futures.
California law criminalizes various forms of resistance or obstruction of law enforcement officers through multiple statutes, each with different elements and penalties.
According to California Penal Code Section 148(a)(1)[1], every person who willfully resists, delays, or obstructs any public officer, peace officer, or emergency medical technician in the discharge or attempt to discharge any duty of his or her office or employment shall be guilty of a misdemeanor.
This is the most common resisting arrest statute in California. Violations constitute misdemeanors carrying:
Elements prosecutors must prove beyond a reasonable doubt:
The key element is that the officer must have been lawfully performing their duties. If the arrest was unlawful or the officer was acting outside the scope of their authority, you cannot be convicted of violating Penal Code Section 148(a)(1).
Resisting – Physically opposing or attempting to prevent an officer from making an arrest or performing duties. This includes pulling away, tensing up, going limp, or any physical action that makes the officer’s job more difficult.
Delaying – Actions that slow down or postpone an officer’s performance of duties, such as hiding evidence, warning others of police presence, or providing false information that causes officers to waste time.
Obstructing – Any conduct that makes it more difficult for officers to perform their duties, including blocking access, interfering with investigations, or preventing officers from reaching suspects.
Penal Code Section 69 is a more serious charge applying when force or violence is used against officers. This statute makes it a crime to:
PC 69 is a “wobbler” offense, meaning it can be charged as either a misdemeanor or felony:
Misdemeanor penalties:
Felony penalties:
PC 69 differs from PC 148(a)(1) in that it requires proof of force, violence, or threats, whereas PC 148(a)(1) can apply to passive resistance or non-violent obstruction.
When resistance involves unwanted physical contact with an officer, prosecutors may charge battery on a peace officer:
PC 243(b) – Battery against a peace officer engaged in performance of duties:
PC 243(c)(2) – Battery on peace officer causing injury:
When resistance involves fleeing from police in a vehicle, additional charges apply:
VC 2800.1 – Evading a peace officer (misdemeanor):
VC 2800.2 – Felony reckless evading:
According to the California Department of Justice[2], arrests for obstruction of justice and resisting arrest occur regularly throughout California, with thousands of prosecutions annually. The Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department[3] reports that resisting arrest charges frequently accompany other arrests, with officers adding PC 148(a)(1) charges when suspects don’t immediately comply with commands.
Lancaster, with a population of approximately 173,000 residents according to the U.S. Census Bureau[4], is the largest city in the Antelope Valley region of northern Los Angeles County. Law enforcement interactions are common in this sprawling desert community, and resisting arrest charges arise regularly.
Traffic Stops Escalating to Physical Altercations – Many resisting arrest cases begin with routine traffic stops on Lancaster’s major streets including Avenue I, Lancaster Boulevard, 10th Street West, 20th Street West, Sierra Highway, and Avenue J. When drivers or passengers don’t immediately comply with officer commands, officers perceive resistance and make arrests for PC 148(a)(1). Common scenarios include:
Domestic Violence Calls with Resisting Arrest Added – When Los Angeles County Sheriff’s deputies respond to domestic violence calls at residences throughout Lancaster, situations are often chaotic with multiple parties involved. Officers frequently arrest primary aggressors, and when arrested individuals don’t immediately comply—whether due to emotional distress, intoxication, or belief they’re being wrongly arrested—officers add resisting arrest charges. These situations commonly involve:
Public Intoxication and Disorderly Conduct Arrests – Officers patrolling downtown Lancaster along Lancaster Boulevard, The BLVD entertainment district, and near bars and restaurants make arrests for public intoxication or disorderly conduct. When intoxicated individuals don’t cooperate—often due to impairment affecting their ability to understand or comply with commands—officers add resisting arrest charges.
Warrant Arrests with Resistance – When deputies attempt to serve arrest warrants at residences throughout Lancaster, individuals sometimes attempt to flee, barricade themselves, or physically resist being taken into custody. These situations often result in additional PC 148(a)(1) or PC 69 charges beyond the underlying warrant.
Protests and Civil Unrest – During protests, demonstrations, or civil disturbances, law enforcement makes arrests for various offenses. When arrestees don’t immediately comply with commands to disperse, get on ground, or submit to handcuffing, resisting arrest charges frequently follow.
Mental Health Crisis Interventions – Deputies responding to mental health crisis calls throughout Lancaster sometimes arrest individuals experiencing psychiatric emergencies. When individuals in crisis don’t comply with commands—often due to their mental state rather than intentional defiance—officers charge resisting arrest despite the person’s diminished capacity.
Police Pursuits and Foot Chases – When suspects flee from police on foot through Lancaster neighborhoods, shopping centers, or parks, officers charge evading or resisting arrest once suspects are apprehended. High-speed vehicle pursuits on State Route 14 or Lancaster streets result in felony evading charges under VC 2800.2.
Lancaster Sheriff’s Station Enforcement – The Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department Lancaster Station, located at 501 West Lancaster Boulevard, serves the City of Lancaster. Deputies document resisting arrest through:
California Highway Patrol Enforcement – The California Highway Patrol[5] Antelope Valley Area office makes arrests throughout Lancaster, particularly along State Route 14 and major arterials. When CHP officers encounter resistance during DUI arrests, traffic stops, or vehicle pursuits, they document evidence supporting resisting arrest charges and forward cases to prosecutors.
Prosecution by Los Angeles County District Attorney – The Los Angeles County District Attorney’s Office Antelope Valley Branch reviews resisting arrest cases filed by law enforcement. According to the Los Angeles County District Attorney’s Office[6], prosecutors evaluate these cases based on available evidence, officer injuries, suspect’s conduct, and criminal history.
Resisting arrest charges arise throughout Lancaster at:
Resisting arrest convictions create direct criminal penalties and significant collateral consequences.
PC 148(a)(1) Misdemeanor Conviction:
PC 69 Felony Conviction:
PC 243(c)(2) Felony Battery on Officer:
Employment Impact – Criminal convictions appear on background checks and affect employment:
Professional Licensing – State licensing boards may discipline professionals:
Immigration Consequences – For non-citizens, criminal convictions can trigger immigration problems. According to the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services[7], certain crimes affect immigration status. While misdemeanor resisting arrest typically doesn’t constitute an aggravated felony, it demonstrates poor moral character and can:
Custody and Family Law Impact – Convictions for resisting arrest can affect family law matters:
Increased Penalties for Future Offenses – Resisting arrest convictions enhance penalties for future crimes:
Prohibition on Firearm Ownership – Felony convictions result in lifetime prohibition on firearm ownership. Even misdemeanor convictions can affect gun rights if they involve domestic violence elements.
Resisting arrest charges can be defended using various strategies depending on specific case facts.
The most powerful defense is demonstrating the underlying arrest or detention was unlawful. If officers didn’t have legal authority to detain or arrest you, you cannot be convicted of resisting arrest under PC 148(a)(1) because a key element is that officers must have been lawfully performing their duties.
Lack of Probable Cause – Officers must have probable cause to arrest you. If they lacked probable cause for the underlying arrest, the entire detention was unlawful and resistance charges must be dismissed. We challenge probable cause by:
Illegal Search – If the arrest resulted from illegal search violating Fourth Amendment rights, the arrest was unlawful. We challenge searches by demonstrating:
Excessive Force – You have the right to defend yourself against excessive force. If officers used unreasonable force, you were entitled to resist to protect yourself from harm. We establish excessive force through:
PC 148(a)(1) requires proof you “willfully” resisted. This means you purposefully or intentionally resisted, not that you accidentally failed to comply or physically couldn’t comply with commands.
Inability to Comply – We demonstrate you couldn’t comply due to:
Lack of Knowledge – If you didn’t know or reasonably should have known the person was a peace officer, you cannot be convicted. We establish lack of knowledge by showing:
Involuntary Conduct – Actions beyond your control don’t constitute willful resistance:
Officers sometimes make false allegations to justify force they used or to retaliate against individuals who questioned their authority.
Officer Credibility – We attack officer credibility through:
Video Evidence – Body camera, dashcam, surveillance video, or cell phone footage often contradicts officer claims. We obtain and analyze all video evidence to demonstrate:
Witness Testimony – Independent civilian witnesses provide credible accounts contradicting officer versions. We locate and interview witnesses who saw:
California law distinguishes between passive resistance (going limp, refusing to move) and active resistance (physically fighting officers). While both can technically violate PC 148(a)(1), juries are far more sympathetic to passive resistance, especially during protests or civil disobedience.
We argue your conduct constituted at most passive resistance resulting from:
You have limited right to defend yourself against unlawful arrest or excessive force. While California generally doesn’t recognize right to resist even unlawful arrest, you can use reasonable force to protect yourself from excessive force by officers.
We present evidence that:
While not complete defenses, mental illness or intoxication can negate willfulness element and provide mitigation.
Mental Health Crisis – We present evidence of:
Intoxication – Severe intoxication negating ability to form willful intent:
For charges based on “delaying” or “obstructing” rather than physical resistance, we argue your conduct didn’t actually delay or obstruct:
Sometimes resistance is so minimal—brief pulling away, turning body, tensing momentarily—that it shouldn’t constitute criminal conduct. We argue:
After arrest for resisting, you’re transported to Lancaster Sheriff’s Station for booking including recording information, fingerprints, photographs, and bail setting. Bail for PC 148(a)(1) typically ranges $5,000 to $25,000 depending on circumstances and criminal history.
First court appearance at Antelope Valley Courthouse (42011 4th Street West, Lancaster) typically occurs within 48 hours if in custody. At arraignment:
We strongly recommend attorney representation at arraignment to protect rights and begin defense immediately.
Discovery – We obtain prosecution evidence including:
Investigation – We conduct independent investigation:
Motion Practice – We file motions to:
Negotiations – We negotiate with prosecutors seeking:
If cases proceed to trial, we provide aggressive representation:
Jury Selection – We select jurors who understand police misconduct occurs, respect constitutional rights, and can objectively evaluate officer testimony.
Opening Statements – We outline defenses and preview evidence showing unlawful arrest or lack of resistance.
Cross-Examination – We vigorously cross-examine officers to expose:
Defense Case – We present:
Closing Arguments – We emphasize reasonable doubt and why evidence fails to prove willful resistance or shows unlawful arrest.
If convictions occur, we present mitigation seeking:
Some first-time offenders may qualify for pretrial diversion where:
Alternative program where:
If mental illness contributed to resistance, PC 1001.36 mental health diversion may apply:
After completing probation successfully for misdemeanor conviction, you can petition for expungement under Penal Code Section 1203.4. Expungement:
No. If the underlying arrest was unlawful because officers lacked probable cause or violated your rights, you cannot be convicted of PC 148(a)(1) because officers weren’t lawfully performing duties.
Reflexive or involuntary movements aren’t “willful” resistance. We present evidence your actions were involuntary reactions to sudden grabbing or pain, not intentional resistance.
Yes. First Amendment protects right to record police in public. Officers cannot arrest you for filming them, and doing so doesn’t constitute obstruction.
Verbal questioning, asking for attorney, or requesting information doesn’t constitute resisting arrest. Officers cannot lawfully arrest you merely for asking questions or exercising constitutional rights.
While you should generally comply to avoid arrest, you have right to ask clarifying questions. Brief delay for clarification isn’t criminal resistance if you ultimately comply.
California law provides limited right to use reasonable force to protect yourself from excessive force by officers. However, this is fact-specific and risky. Better to comply and challenge excessive force later through legal channels.
Physical disability, hearing impairment, or medical condition preventing compliance negates willfulness element. We present medical evidence documenting your limitations.
Many first-time offenders receive probation without jail, especially with no injuries to officers. Factors include criminal history, circumstances, whether you have attorney, and completion of classes.
Yes. We achieve dismissals through demonstrating unlawful arrest, lack of evidence, officer credibility problems, or negotiating with prosecutors based on weaknesses in their case.
Officer injuries increase prosecution likelihood and penalties. However, we challenge causation by showing injuries resulted from officer’s own actions, pre-existing conditions, or exaggeration.
Resisting arrest typically accompanies other charges. Successfully defending resisting charge often helps defend underlying charges by showing officer misconduct, illegal arrest, or credibility problems.
First-time offenders may qualify for diversion, especially if mental health or substance abuse contributed. We advocate for treatment-focused resolutions.
Extensive Criminal Defense Experience – We’ve defended hundreds of resisting arrest cases throughout Southern California, achieving dismissals, acquittals, and favorable outcomes.
Understanding of Police Misconduct – We know officers sometimes make false allegations to justify force or retaliate against individuals who questioned authority. We aggressively challenge officer credibility.
Skilled at Challenging Unlawful Arrests – We thoroughly investigate whether underlying arrest was lawful, filing motions to suppress evidence and dismiss charges based on constitutional violations.
Local Lancaster Knowledge – We regularly appear at Antelope Valley Courthouse and understand local judges, prosecutors, and how these cases are handled in Lancaster.
Access to Experts – We retain use-of-force experts, medical experts, and other specialists who provide testimony supporting your defense.
Proven Results – Our successful defense includes dismissals based on unlawful arrests, acquittals after demonstrating excessive force, reduced charges, and favorable pleas avoiding jail.
Compassionate Representation – We understand many resisting arrest charges arise from misunderstandings, fear, or defending yourself against excessive force. We provide compassionate representation while fighting aggressively.
Bilingual Services – We provide fluent Spanish-language services. Hablamos Español.
Available 24/7 – Arrests happen at all hours. We’re available immediately to protect your rights.
Resisting arrest charges threaten your freedom and your record. Don’t wait to get help. Early intervention provides the best chance for favorable outcomes.
Don’t make statements to police. Anything you say can be used against you. Exercise your right to remain silent and request an attorney.
Don’t assume conviction is inevitable. Many resisting arrest cases are defensible, especially when arrests were unlawful or officers used excessive force.
Don’t delay contacting an attorney. Evidence must be preserved, witnesses interviewed, and defenses investigated immediately.
Contact Tu Defensor Criminalista today for a free, confidential consultation. We’ll review your case, explain options, and develop a defense strategy. We’re available 24/7 because arrests happen at all hours.
Your freedom and your rights are worth fighting for. Let Tu Defensor Criminalista fight for you with the experience and dedication your case demands. Call now.
Attorney Armando Josué Cespedes is rated 5.0 on Avvo, with 34 five-star reviews from clients praising his dedication, professionalism, and results. Many note how his trial skills and attention to detail led to reduced charges or outright dismissals.
English English
Español de MéxicoThank you! We need your help. Would you share your experience on one of these sites?
If you have concerns you wish to address privately
